Squall7
A li'l bit different
I used to think the same thing, but I have since changed my mind. His arguments are generally reasoned. I can also see why he responds the way he does, looking at some of the things religion has done and some of the things religious people have said in ignorance of science. While it's not without it's flaws, it is actually logical and if you can follow it, it provides a perspective that celebrates science.Dawkins really needs to chill out and go and get laid. However typical of a theist that may sound, it's true. It's like the man has devoted his entire life to destroying religion- I personally think it's sad and desperate. The God Dillusion was fine (although not itself wthout flaws), but now the guy is starting to come off as a bit of a fundamentalist. He's entitled to his opinion, but his opinion comes across as both arrogant and ignorant.
The thing is, is that it doesn't provide all the answers, but then it accepts that. It simply provides reasonable explanations for why things are the way they are as a rational alternative, rather than on equal footing (and whatever anybody says, Christianity is not the default if science cannot explain things straight away).
Fundamentalist? No, he doesn't bomb anyone, slaughter anyone, the worst thing he does is make people look foolish, specifically people who try to convert him or say "what if you're wrong?".