No, the decision to attack vulnerable civilians has nothing to do with any prior provocation. By that reasoning, the man who beats his wife can blame it on the economy, his employer, his job, etc. The man who rapes can then blame it on all the sexual advertising around him, or pornography. Etc, etc.
Terrorism is not an act that is provoked. It is a decision to go after civilians who have not provoked anybody. To use any cause as a justification for terrorism says more about the one making such statements, than about the subject being commented upon.
Terrorism is not an act that is provoked. It is a decision to go after civilians who have not provoked anybody. To use any cause as a justification for terrorism says more about the one making such statements, than about the subject being commented upon.