Christians

[kissoff182]

why does that make me stupid? I never insulted you so why are you insulting me?

I BOLDED "relationship with Jesus" and said you obviously had anal sex with him countless times. What DO YOU NOT GET?

 

[kissoff182]

He's just trying to be funny in a mocking way.

She*

Mods, merge these 3 posts, please, haha.

 

[I_Dont_Know859]

I BOLDED "relationship with Jesus" and said you obviously had anal sex with him countless times. What DO YOU NOT GET?

now why would you think that?

 

[kissoff182]

now why would you think that?

Have you ever heard of a joke?

 

[I_Dont_Know859]

Have you ever heard of a joke?

well i guess i just didnt see the humor in that...

 

[kissoff182]

http://loljesus.com/wp-content/uploads/throat.jpg

 

[Skippy]

lolololololoLOLOLOL

What about someone who got AIDS from an infected needle while they were a virgin, didn't know about it, got married, AND THEN had sex with his/her spouse, who was also a virgin, passing it on to him/her?

I realize that this scenario is perfectly possible, but where did the infected blood from the needle come from? Was that needle previously used on an infected patient? If so, where did that patient get it from?

 

[Skippy]

She*

Oops, sorry!

 

[Skippy]

http://loljesus.com/wp-content/uploads/throat.jpg

So did posting that make you feel even more superior than you did before?

 

[DBloke]

STOP TRIPPLE POSTING
its annoying

 

[Gymdawg]

Are all the Christians on here who believe they have a relationship with Jesus coherently stupid, or is it just me?

Coherently stupid: Is that even possible? Actually, no, it's not.

1. logically connected; consistent: a coherent argument.
2. Marked by an orderly, logical, and aesthetically consistent relation of parts: a coherent essay.

So apparently there's at least one "coherently stupid" christian here and he just pointed out your idiocy. Thanks, you've saved me the trouble of having to piece apart your ignorant "joke" of a post; my point has already been established.

 

[Gaz]

But where did that tainted blood come from? From someone who caught it from sex? If they would not have had sex outside of marriage then they would not have caught it and passed it into the blood supply.

you don't catch aids, you catch HIV, which then causes AIDS.
And AIDS originated in sub-saharan africa, during the 20th centuray, quite a while before the bible was written (or was it)

 

[Bulldogxx831]

Everyman is his own god, in charge of his own destiny, and capable of creating power for himself. The weakest are left behind and the strong shall prevail.


thats the way I see it anyway.

You shall make an excellent dictator. Hitler viewed Jews as weak and therefore left them behind. You are on a path to prejudice and racism.

I realize that this scenario is perfectly possible, but where did the infected blood from the needle come from? Was that needle previously used on an infected patient? If so, where did that patient get it from?

The patient would get it from their parents who got it from their parents etc etc. Until it would all come down to a pervert having sex with a monkey and then having sex with a woman who has never heard of AIDS because it wouldn't have existed at the time. Then before it was dectatable(sp?) it became wide-spread. I'm sure its some peoples fault for having sexual relations out of marriage. But what about all the people who get married and not get tested.

And kissoff182 stop being immature.

 

[Solard]

as far as im concerned, i believe in the bible. i havent a problem with those who do not ie ive made friends with some of them. most people (especially intelligent people or so it would seem to me :scared: ) are biased toward Christians because they cant produce sufficient proof of God, making them stupid to place there "bets" on a religion whereas some simply for the sake of it are atheist or w/e religion they are. It is indeed true that i doubt that i would be Christian if my parents were not, it very highly unlikely. Your parents do influence your thinking, but to call it brainwashing is incorrect. if you closely look at the Bible, though it does say to follow what it says, it doesnt say you have to. Ie-imo (of course, most the religous ppl here will disagree) you truly dont have to follow anything but what God says will save you. IE 1st corinthians 15 1-4 if you believe those verses as i do, you can go out and do whatever you want... it says in the Bible (true, i havent read the Bible through and through, nor do i read it regularly, so if im wrong, correct me..) that Jesus's death took care of all sins IE- if you were to believe that, you would be able to do whatever wrongs you wanted, and still get to heaven. (this is just to point out that christian life is not binding, not to prove facts) imo there are too many maybe's for me to believe in evolution, of course, as i said, this is derived from my parent's belief, but in all truth, if you are indeed atheist, is there really a point in debating against Christians? popular christians try to sway ones thinking so that, in there mind, you are headed for heaven. popular atheist debate for what? to tell people that they are wrong? if nothing happens after death, than is there truly a point to try and make people believe in evolution, when in the end, it really won't matter? pplz might have taken my post the wrong way, true, i am not that 'learned' in most the stuff this topic has to say, but alot looks very simple from my stand point. imo, debate wise, Christians and evolutionist draw even, it really just shows who is more intelligent, not who is right imo, people take religion way too far, it is true. i dont plan to go preaching to people unless my opinion is asked of because I know that no religion (and even as i said, imo nor can evolution) stand closy scrutinization... when Christians pull out the Bible to prove solmething to you, it cant be proven, ive already admitted (thats why ive tried to make scenarios in which the reader does believe the bible) poeple say those who believe in God cannot be credited scientifically, well whooptidoo, its not as if all genius are atheist lmao. there are many, scientifically more important areas than evolution vs. creation (neither truly effect/affect [never could get thee right one >:[ ] day-to-day life as far as with me...) like i said, idk why this has to be a heated debate, if someone believes in evolution, state your facts, the religious person states his, yet are the two truly at odds, or even imperceptibly different? when it comes down to it, only the extremes of each side act obviously different, and hopefully no1 is part of the extreme
as far as im concerened, i lost the debate yet my belief really isnt changed, people might say that this is a stubborn way of thinking, but in all truth, a say im defeated because some of the people who are actually debating are way smarter than me, i just felt like adding 2 cents. Like i said winning the debate is all about who is better 'learned' and when the loser does get "learned' (if he does continue what he was believing after the debate) and this loser becomes as smart as the one who beat him, the next time they debate, it could be a draw. Imo, can i prove Creation in any way? no. its a simply, yet stinging answer that was known from the beginning. there is just no way to prove Creation in scientific means. But if we're all doomed to an death w/o an 'afterlife' than it really can't hurt to be religous, can it?

 

[Skippy]

The patient would get it from their parents who got it from their parents etc etc.

Children born from HIV+ parents are not typically HIV+ themselves.

Until it would all come down to a pervert having sex with a monkey and then having sex with a woman who has never heard of AIDS because it wouldn't have existed at the time.

Most likely it came from the practice of eating monkeys (getting their tainted blood in your bloodstream during the preparation of the meat, or drinking the blood when you have a cut in or around your mouth) - and then passed around sexually afterward.

Then before it was dectatable(sp?) it became wide-spread. I'm sure its some peoples fault for having sexual relations out of marriage. But what about all the people who get married and not get tested.

If those people who got married without getting tested had not had sex before marriage, then it's highly unlikely they would have anything to pass onto their spouse. But like I admitted in a previous post, people having pre-marital sex (or commiting adultery) isn't going to stop, so the means for these things to be passed around easily still exists.