Why do you guys hate so much

[acphydro]

From the person who claims he owns one :frown2: Ps3 is better than any other system hands down. It actually has adult games :shocked:

[ADULT] games? rofl, what are you 15 or 16? Is it that hard for you to understand that Sony made a mistake?

 

[acphydro]

See what I mean? The truth hurts, he gets insulted, then feels it neccessary to attack me because he didn't like what he heard.

Grow up.

And I DID own one.

I see what you mean. Bottom line is new threads discuss different aspects of its painful existance. [usually]

 

[Wii&Ps3]

The 360 is on par with the PS3, AND it actually has some good games and for $400 you get the top of the line model.

"Adult" games... what are you, 16?

So the ps3 is doing pretty good if you think its launch games are on par with the 360. The only decent game for the ps3 is resistance, and its far from what the ps3 can do. I would rather pay $100 more and get a blu ray player, better graphics, and free online play.

Plus I wanted something to play hd movies. Add the hd player for the 360 and it pushes it up to $500 or $600 (same price as the ps3). Ive only played a few games for the 360, but i like the ps3 a little more.

 

[Wii&Ps3]

[ADULT] games? rofl, what are you 15 or 16? Is it that hard for you to understand that Sony made a mistake?

nope im 24. I feel the games for the wii are targeted for a younger audience. Nintendo has too much control over games for their systems. The wii games are following the same footsteps as the gamecube. 80-90% of games for a younger crowd, and 10-20% for a mature crowd. Im 24 and dont feel like shooting rabbits with a plunger gun. I would rather shoot people with a real gun.

 

[BlenderWizard]

So the ps3 is doing pretty good if you think its launch games are on par with the 360. The only decent game for the ps3 is resistance, and its far from what the ps3 can do. I would rather pay $100 more and get a blu ray player, better graphics, and free online play.

Plus I wanted something to play hd movies. Add the hd player for the 360 and it pushes it up to $500 or $600 (same price as the ps3). Ive only played a few games for the 360, but i like the ps3 a little more.

I said nothing of the games. The capabilities of the systems are comparable, especially when you get the HD player for 360.

 

[BlenderWizard]

I would rather shoot people with a real gun.

I guess I could be wrong, but I thought that's what you did in COD3 and Red Steel.

 

[Wii&Ps3]

I said nothing of the games. The capabilities of the systems are comparable, especially when you get the HD player for 360.

which cant play games on the 360. The ps3 has alot more potential than the 360 ever will. Even the launch games are comparable graphic wise. Nobody has even scratched the surface with the ps3 yet.

 

[Wii&Ps3]

I guess I could be wrong, but I thought that's what you did in COD3 and Red Steel.

cod and red steel are terrible on the wii. Thank god I rented them instead do bought.

I guess you misread the part of 80% kids games and 20% adult games that I posted?

 

[Sovieto]

See what I mean? The truth hurts, he gets insulted, then feels it neccessary to attack me because he didn't like what he heard.

Grow up.

And I DID own one.

Just stop talking, I don't really like the PS3, so I wasn't insulted.\

p.s. that picture isnt like a diss or anything because that guy is a ninty fanboy, just thought id let yall know if you didnt since that picture could just be giving the fact ps3 "sucks"

 

[acphydro]

nope im 24. I feel the games for the wii are targeted for a younger audience. Nintendo has too much control over games for their systems. The wii games are following the same footsteps as the gamecube. 80-90% of games for a younger crowd, and 10-20% for a mature crowd. Im 24 and dont feel like shooting rabbits with a plunger gun. I would rather shoot people with a real gun.

I feel that many of the games were indeed [targeted] for a younger audience, but not on as much of a ratio as you may think. The PS3 is following the footsteps of the Sega Dreamcast. Nintendo is actually appealing to everyone in general this time around. Especially since there is actual interactivity on their system, something microsoft didn't try to implement, and something sony tried to copy but got it way wrong.

But even if I did believe you were 24 and wanted to use a real weapon, its hard to overlook the fact that you can't handle FPS games on a PC. Don't know if maybe they are too graphic, too violent or just show way too many details or not. But you can't really call yourself a FPS fan if you are playing generic shooters on consoles such as the PS3 or xbox360. Further, if you really like realism then you would be playing on the PC as it has the most detailed graphics you'll ever see. So you are essentially contradicting yourself here son. :thumbsup:

 

[Sovieto]

I feel that many of the games were indeed [targeted] for a younger audience, but not on as much of a ratio as you may think. The PS3 is following the footsteps of the Sega Dreamcast. Nintendo is actually appealing to everyone in general this time around. Especially since there is actual interactivity on their system, something microsoft didn't try to implement, and something sony tried to copy but got it way wrong.

But even if I did believe you were 24 and wanted to use a real weapon, its hard to overlook the fact that you can't handle FPS games on a PC. Don't know if maybe they are too graphic, too violent or just show way too many details or not. But you can't really call yourself a FPS fan if you are playing generic shooters on consoles such as the PS3 or xbox360. Further, if you really like realism then you would be playing on the PC as it has the most detailed graphics you'll ever see. So you are essentially contradicting yourself here son. :thumbsup:

you do know when you use [ ] it means it was added in by someone else:thumbsup:

 

[COLDshiver]

But even if I did believe you were 24 and wanted to use a real weapon, its hard to overlook the fact that you can't handle FPS games on a PC. Don't know if maybe they are too graphic, too violent or just show way too many details or not. But you can't really call yourself a FPS fan if you are playing generic shooters on consoles such as the PS3 or xbox360. Further, if you really like realism then you would be playing on the PC as it has the most detailed graphics you'll ever see. So you are essentially contradicting yourself here son.

QFT! If you want real FPS gaming, PC is the way to go. You have dom shooters like BF2, BF2142, HL2, CS:S, DoD:S, and tons more. If you don't feel like paying for the games, America's Army is one of the best.

 

[Sovieto]

i pefer FPSs on consoles over computers, they are completely different control styles, bf2 is on 360, just saying

 

[acphydro]

you do know when you use [ ] it means it was added in by someone else:thumbsup:

It also has many other uses. However I could be using a different set of brackets for my purposes.

 

[acphydro]

i pefer FPSs on consoles over computers, they are completely different control styles, bf2 is on 360, just saying

Yes the control styles are totally different, on the PC aiming is far superior. I played BF2 on my 360 when I had one and I wasn't too impressed. The controls were rather annoying and not to mention aiming on a console within a FPS just isn't that fun to do, and an annoyance in my opinion.

There were some good FPS on consoles, aka perfect dark, goldeneye and perfect dark zero to name a few, but they could have been better using a real control scheme.