Official Graphics Comments & Criticism

[ssbb_lover]

Thanks, S. I agree that the lighting is too bright on my render, and I'll fix that right now. Any other comments?

 

[Syntax]

I don't see anything else that could use changing. In my opinion, it looks fine.

 

[ssbb_lover]

Speaking of sigs, S...


:lol:

 

[Syntax]

I feel so used..

 

[DBloke]

Behold
I R USEIN TEH GIMP

Might make another sig for some one

 

[Syntax]

Nice work on the signature Prinny. I like it

 

[demonflair]

Ricky, that's awesome, man.

And I will be doing more of this stuff in the future.

And Tyler, I quite like the way the red cross appears to be above some white box. I think that it's really artistic. Good job.

:lol:

 

[Sneaux125]

Newest -

c/c =D

Anything

 

[Syntax]

If this would make the sig better, I'm not exactly sure. However, I suggest on making the top left and right corners of the signature a bit darker. Thus, having the lighting of the signature focusing more on the render.

 

[Byuakuya]

http://demonflair.deviantart.com/art/The-Alien-Hostage-74671510

Looking good Ricardo. Nicely done.

Ricky, that's awesome, man.

Haha, we'll see. Unfortunately the entire project just got set back due to half of it being wiped out...I'll see what I can do. It's almost inevitable with the kind of thing I'm doing, I'll try to get it done ASAP, however.

Take your time. I am sure that we will be shown a master-piece in the end. :lol:

*DOUBLE POST*

Really happy with the way this one turned out, considering I haven't made a sig in ages.

C&C​

I agree with everything that Syntax mentioned above, especially the text placement. Nicely done.

 

[ssbb_lover]

And Tyler, I quite like the way the red cross appears to be above some white box. I think that it's really artistic. Good job.

:lol:

...Red cross? White box? :lol:


Thanks for the comments everyone.


@ Sneaux: There's no lighting. Use the burn/dodge tools and other lighting techniques (Lighting Effects, Lens Flare, Gradients, a simple black/white brushing) to make the render stand out more. The colors could use some work, but you don't have to change those unless you want to. I'd also suggest working on depth next time, it looks sort of weird that the orange/red "background" is not only going behind him, but covering over him. Screws things up a bit. I do like the grungy look to it, nice choice of style.

 

[Close]

Just using my defaults in a quick one, so dont say 'LIKE ZOMG CLOSSSEEE U MOTHA' FUUUUUUCCCC!@@%$ SUUUCKCKCKCK SHHHHHHH$#$#$$^ !!!!!1111'

P.S- Ssbb got delayed which sucks arse :sick:​

 

[ssbb_lover]

Ryan, it would be lovely if you could tell me where you got that brush pack that you used in the bottom left portion of your work.

As far as C&C goes, It's nice. The 3 things I'll point out:

• Make the background a bit more interesting; I realize you were going for a more simple effect back there to compliment the focus on the center, but having just a little something more would make it look great.
• I don't really like the smudging on the hearts. It's a little stray and messy.
• Not too fond of the border. I think it'd look fine with a simple 2 px. red, or make it fancier to be similar to the rest of the sig.

Mind C&C'ing my current sig (show below)?

 

[Close]

Ryan, it would be lovely if you could tell me where you got that brush pack that you used in the bottom left portion of your work.

As far as C&C goes, It's nice. The 3 things I'll point out:

• Make the background a bit more interesting; I realize you were going for a more simple effect back there to compliment the focus on the center, but having just a little something more would make it look great.
• I don't really like the smudging on the hearts. It's a little stray and messy.
• Not too fond of the border. I think it'd look fine with a simple 2 px. red, or make it fancier to be similar to the rest of the sig.

Mind C&C'ing my current sig (show below)?

Thanks for actually C&Cing my new 'creation ?', without me asking:


1. Nice text.
2. Nice splattering.
3. Nice 'glitter' with the apply images (Large Soft brush w/dissolve 1%?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
There's nothing bad about your sig, but there's nothing to actually 'strike your eye'. I think mostly because of the small sig size that your working with. I would probably make larger, like 400 by whatever or somethin, because it really is hard to make something with little space. I know, I dont really have any sigs that 'strikes your eyes' but trust me, make your sig sizes bigger and it will be a bigger and better effect. And it like, putting mirrors in rooms make them 'seem bigger', pretty much the same with sigs. More background than render makes it 'seem bigger'. Your current sig does not really have a background, it's more like well.......a stock. Therefore it does not have a background, so you cant implement what I said with a stock sig. Enough with my lecture, good sig overall. 8.3/10 :yesnod:

 

[ssbb_lover]

Thanks for actually C&Cing my new 'creation ?', without me asking:

No problem buddy, everyone likes critique and comments.

1. Nice text.
2. Nice splattering.
3. Nice 'glitter' with the apply images (Large Soft brush w/dissolve 1%?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
There's nothing bad about your sig, but there's nothing to actually 'strike your eye'. I think mostly because of the small sig size that your working with. I would probably make larger, like 400 by whatever or somethin, because it really is hard to make something with little space. I know, I dont really have any sigs that 'strikes your eyes' but trust me, make your sig sizes bigger and it will be a bigger and better effect. And it like, putting mirrors in rooms make them 'seem bigger', pretty much the same with sigs. More background than render makes it 'seem bigger'. Your current sig does not really have a background, it's more like well.......a stock. Therefore it does not have a background, so you cant implement what I said with a stock sig. Enough with my lecture, good sig overall. 8.3/10 :yesnod:

I get exactly what you mean. Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation. Great tip about the larger sig size, the analogy is a perfect way of explaining it. I'll try that next time I make a sig.


P.S. Mind telling me about those brushes? :wink: