OP
RPGMasterTurk91
Turkish RPG Master
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #61
Did you even read my post? I explained how there could be alternatives to an "original existence". In fact, I think I should elaborate on one point I made: What we percieve as the arrow of time- that is, 'cause and effect'- are a result of the laws of physics (in particular the Second Law of Thermodynamics). The laws of physics are a property of our Universe, but there is no reason to assume thiey should apply beyond it. So the concepts of cause and effect as we understand may not even have applied in the time "before" the Big Bang.Well actually I'm not being hasty at all, to me, this is one of the few things that proves God's existence. There ARE scientific answers to "what created the energy that was required for the big bang", whether we know the science behind it or not. But in the end, the only question that can only have one definite answer is this: Was their an original existence?" And that definite answer has to be yes, I explained earlier that if there was not, this world wouldn't be in existence, as, if the opposite were true, there would be nothing. And it's certainly not true that there is nothing, but rather something. And the original thing could not have been created because it's creator would need a creator, and it's creator's creator would need a creator, so on and so forth. This alone proves to me that God exists. There are various signs in nature that only an intelligent designer could have given certain qualities to certain things.
Sigh... Turk, you keep repeating the same old intelligent design argument through those long-winded quotes, but intelligent design is not science, it's not testable, and it provides no quantitative measure of "complexity" (what is the exact point where you can say "this is too complex to have evolved"?). Evolution, meanwhile, has long been accepted by the scientific community, including practically every single biologist in the West. Believe it or not, it really does explain all these things you've quoted, like the giraffe's neck or the communal nature of ants.Back to giraffes:
Giraffes have many amazing characteristics. One of these is that their neck stands on 7 vertebrae, just like that of all other mammals, even though it is so long. Another amazing fact about giraffes is that they do not have any problem pumping blood up to their brain on top of their long neck. A little thinking would make one notice how difficult it must be to have the blood pumped so high. But giraffes do not have any problem about this, because their hearts are equipped with features to pump blood as high as necessary. This enables them to carry on with their lives effortlessly.
Yet they still face another problem while they drink water. Essentially, giraffes should have died of high blood pressure every time they bent down to drink water. However, the perfect system in their necks completely eliminates this risk. When they bend down, the valves in their neck vessels are shut down and they prevent excess blood from flowing to the brain.
There is no doubt that the giraffes did not acquire these traits by planning themselves in accordance with their needs. It is even more implausible to say that all these vital features were shaped over time through a gradual and accidental evolutionary process. In order for a giraffe to stay alive, it is vital for it to have a pumping system to transmit blood to the brain and a valve system to prevent high blood pressure the minute it bends down. If any one of these characteristics did not exist or did not function properly, then it would be impossible for the giraffe to go on living.
The conclusion to be derived from all this is that the giraffe species was born into the world with all the characteristics vital for its living already there. It is impossible for a non-existent being to master its body and acquire essential traits consciously. So, the very existence of giraffes unquestionably proves that they are created by a conscious creation, that is by God.
Well yeah, I find it funny how for every shred of information or "evidence" you offer, it leads back to evolution. So why then cannot my reasoning be that God is responsible for such things, and not necessarily evolution in itself?