StepOnfrog said:Sorry. You rant on about an 'Extreme' analogy, yet in this post you are essentially defending your 'analogy' (tends to be more of a direct statement of you you belief, rather than analogy) with yet another statement...
Pfft!
You never finsished round 1 or 2, how can you be ready for round 3.? We're still waiting for a decent enough explaination to your blarb about stealing and rape, especially now that ...
... has given a more worded definition to your essential rant. :ciappa: All you replied to this was that you had previously posted...
... but, then returning to the original subject of this current post...
...seems your argument is starting to run round in circles....
:frown2:
I can easily understand your need to crack the encryption on VC games... But, I really do shake my head <shakes head & frowns> at your sweeping statement RE: stealing & rape, especially when you try to disguise it as an analogy. <still not happy at your children stealing food = raping - rant>
Right, I'm off to my own forum to moan my 'nads off about this... <back shortly>
Of course I'll defend my own posts---thats common sense. The major point you failed to see of the [extreme analogy] is a crime is a crime in theory. That is not a belief that is fact. People can analyze and generate ideas all day long and these threads can go on forever and ever. You claim a [decent] explanation is needed or you are waiting to hear one, yet what is decent to you may not be decent enough to others. If you still can't understand what has been written above, then I don't think you will be able to fully understand what exactly we are talking about here which is why it is starting to sound like you are getting confused.
Round 2 ended with most of your post. Round 3 started near the end when you began getting confused about the subject. "...seems your argument is starting to run round in circles...." If it helps---think of it as more of a post to show you what can happen when an extreme comparison is made and is true theoretically. It will upset a few people and they will need a long time to think about it and will post arguments that have no merit to it. Stealing is stealing it doesnt matter what you take, if you have taken it then you have taken it. My post clearly stated that the punishment should be the same for the crimes of the same type.
You rape someone you get 5 years, you steal something you get 5 years. Which brings us to another point---there are always flaws in any argument EVEN if you can provide PROOF, because someone will always be able to get around your argument with something of their own.
So I suggest to re-read the last paragraph in the post about [rape] that I made and pay close attention the closing statement. Don't take it as a specific situation, re-read it until you understand how the same basic principle applies to theft.
That being said, I don't have a need to crack encryption for Virtual Console as I will purchase the software I intend to use. Any other method not endorsed by Nintendo for their software would be obtained in an illegal way, whether it be stealing, rape, etc. The software isn't overpriced in the first place, which tells us that anyone wanting to play for free is a rapist by your understanding of my post. We are talking theoretically here. That should shed some light on the subject for you
edit: it is possible that calling it an analogy should have been avoided --- as it could be considered a theoretical analogy or anything other than a true 1:1 analogy.
Last edited: