Official Graphics Comments & Criticism

Here are a couple of Sports Sigs I've made.

GradySizemore.png


LT.png
 
tarheelsuperman said:
Here are a couple of Sports Sigs I've made.

GradySizemore.png


LT.png

Both of them are quite good !

But there is something missing......I feel that the sigs are flat.
 
Both of those signatures look pretty good TS. Keep up the good work.

9/10
 
Popert said:
These are my latest sigs just finished them last night...

1st:
Popertsig15.png


2nd:
Popertsig16.png


Please comment... :D
They look good, but both the renders appear to be kind of dark (especially in the second one). But they are both very nice overall.
 
tarheelsuperman said:
Here are a couple of Sports Sigs I've made.

GradySizemore.png

Good quality render.
But the light source is in the wrong position, you put it coming from behind when it should come from left to the right, see his arms and right side of his face, they indicate you were the lights are coming, work on that.
And the bg needs contrast, and looks flat.
Text is bad for this kind of sig.
6/10 :)

LT.png


Again, the text is bad for this kind of sig, it draws the attention of the focal away, which shouldn't happen.
Left and right C4Ds draws the attention of the focal away. And the depth could have some work.
Great colors though :)
6,5/10 :)


Tharheel, you're a great sig maker, but I suggest that you buy some tuts either in Gamerenders or Planetrender (I suggest PR) to learn the most advance techniques.
It's time to pass trough the next level dude :ciappa:
 
Last edited:
demonflair said:
Render far from to blended..
Bg is plain and flat.
Blue overlayed border looks horrible.
No text.

2.5/10

Avy - 5/10

Bold 1. What does that mean?
Bold 2. That counts???
Bold 3. Anyone have an analysis? :/
I get what you mean about the bg, I just have no clue what to do about it.
I'll get rid of the border sir!
 
Monsteroids said:
Bold 1. What does that mean?
Bold 2. That counts???
Bold 3. Anyone have an analysis? :/
I get what you mean about the bg, I just have no clue what to do about it.
I'll get rid of the border sir!

Bwuahahah

Ok, I'll explain.

Bold 1.The render has a weird effect in his left side, it's a bad effect and it just makes the render with low quality.

Bold 2. To me counts, it's part of the art :D

Bold 3. Does it need one??
 
Monsteroids said:
There's no depth (meaning it looks flat)
-the diagonal lines over the tiger's face only make it worse-
There aren't enough effects (so it's boring)
The blue border is fine (not everything needs a solid black line)
Not all sigs need text.
 
demonflair said:
Bwuahahah

Ok, I'll explain.

Bold 1.The render has a weird effect in his left side, it's a bad effect and it just makes the render with low quality.

Bold 2. To me counts, it's part of the art :D

Bold 3. Does it need one??

1. Is it that brightness? You did say the left, but I see nothing awkward.
2. okaays
3. that boring, eh?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top