Official Graphics Comments & Criticism

[Syntax]

What exactly is the first one?? Also the text in it is really hard to make out..

Second signature:

I think this one was more of a step backward.. I don't really like the background and text used. I suggest you avoid using bevel and emboss when messing around with text effects.. Try to make the text blend into the signature more by changing its colors and adding a stroke of another color from the signature to it. Or at least choose one color then add a drop shadow and mess around with the settings. Another suggestion would be to add a border to both of the signatures..

 

[iRAWR]

when doing a gradient, bucket fill with the cracked virsion of cs2, does it take really long?

 

[Syntax]

I don't think it should, why?

 

[demonflair]

Again..

Comment this:

PR's SOTW

Theme: Death

 

[tarheelsuperman]

Again..

Comment this:

PR's SOTW

Theme: Death

Sorry...just don't like it. I personally don't like the tall to square type sigs. Plus I understand that it is suppose to be a death sig but it doesn't seem to flow with the cemetery and the blood. I would go with one or the other if you know what i mean. Unless you want to do some zombies in the cemetery attacking someone. The black splatter is ok with the cemetery stock and the pen tool is ok.

 

[demonflair]

Sorry...just don't like it. I personally don't like the tall to square type sigs. Plus I understand that it is suppose to be a death sig but it doesn't seem to flow with the cemetery and the blood. I would go with one or the other if you know what i mean. Unless you want to do some zombies in the cemetery attacking someone. The black splatter is ok with the cemetery stock and the pen tool is ok.

Eheh..

PR = Good critics

Wiichat = Bad critics

Which one to follow??

:shifty:


Anyway, tall to square type sigs are very common in SOTWs. And very appreciated by great Graphics Designers.

 

[ganton]

hey demon i think it was amazing
but thats coming from the guy that made this

 

[ssbb_lover]

Eheh..

PR = Good critics

Wiichat = Bad critics

Which one to follow??

:shifty:


Anyway, tall to square type sigs are very common in SOTWs. And very appreciated by great Graphics Designers.

Wow, how cocky was that?

 

[Close]

C&C please:

 

[iRAWR]

Eheh..

PR = Good critics

Wiichat = Bad critics

Which one to follow??

:shifty:


Anyway, tall to square type sigs are very common in SOTWs. And very appreciated by great Graphics Designers.

um the critics in PR are to nice?

 

[Gymdawg]

Wow, how cocky was that?

Too cocky...

 

[Popert]

Alright please recomment on this sig I edited it a bit...

The other sig was stupid I know

 

[Popert]

C&C please:

I like it, does is display your best work? it is appealing to me

 

[Close]

I like it, does is display your best work? it is appealing to me

Yes, thank you !

 

[tarheelsuperman]

Eheh..

PR = Good critics

Wiichat = Bad critics

Which one to follow??

:shifty:


Anyway, tall to square type sigs are very common in SOTWs. And very appreciated by great Graphics Designers.

Wow, OK. I guess I won't express my opinion of your sigs. Oh and I probably wouldn't recommend posting for comments if you don't really think WiiChat Critics are good critics.

It was just one opinion at that. I could understand slamming everyone in the design lounge if more people were saying it sucked. I just don't like dark stuff so much so it doesn't appeal to me. Good Luck with the PR Sig of the week though.