bruceleroy
WiiChat Member
- Dec 22, 2006
- 242
- 1
Let's break it down with logic.
Company A, Company B and Company C
Company A makes an original, mature, IP, Madworld, it sells poorly
Company B makes shovelware like Carnival Games, it sells like hot cakes
Now, if you were Company C, based on the history of Company A and B, which business model would make more sense to follow?
First of all your logic is crap cuz you only used two games on the Wii out of the entire library. I've already told you before and provided proof that hardcore games can sell on the Wii. If Company C would look at the sales of 3rd party, they'd realize that 3rd party games can sell on the Wii (shovelware or not). They (Bethesda, HVS, Ubisoft, Konami) also realize that the Wii is already flooded w/ shovelware, so they decide to make games for traditional gamers instead (Gladiator, Conduit, Grinder, Silent Hill, Red Steel 2, Bethesda's upcoming big title, HAWX, etc.). I'm starting to think that maybe you work for Sony or Microsoft. Why are you against the Wii so much if you don't work for them? Are you afraid that all games will be for the casual in the future? Casual gamers will eventually dive into more complex games. That's what developers also realizes about the Wii owners.
Last edited: