blueovalboy7
They call me Hammy!
I will give you a few of your arguments, but I don't feel like making the post a mile long so I'll just leave it at that, all I know is it will be a different game the next time around, which is assuming their is a next time around this post season, because as the well known quote says, "On any given Sunday, any team has a chance to win." So assuming the NFC Championship game is between those two I still don't see either beating any of the teams that might come out of the AFC except maybe the Browns and/or Tennessee. I will definitely look forward to that game between the Packers and Cowboys, if it turns out to be that match-up.metalfreak said:thats irrelevant, juding from what you have said you are probably somewhat of a Packers fan, i could just as easily make the case for any team, i never made arbitrary assertions in my post i backed up my claims
yes i had noticed that, but the funny thing is, no matter how "fundamental packer offense" rodgers played it was still quite unpredictable for the cowboys defense to cover his style. there is next to no informatin about him. that being said i seriously doubt the idea of the packers offense making many adaptations to the cowboys defense, the cowboys dont play a dominating style of football they make the plays they need to in order to win the games and they have been doing that all year.
1. yea, harris is overrrated and fortunately TO isnt. we saw what happened
2. when the play man-to-man having woodson and kgb becomes irrelevant because TO will still get open
3. favre having weapons is irrelevant to the cowboys offensive productions and skill
most players in the nfl are either overrated or underrated. terry glenn is by no means overrrated, i have heard next to no talk about him what-so-ever. last year he played substantially better than TO and hes still hurt but hes already starting to run routes effectively. He is better than Crayton as well because crayton is as good as he is now because of Terry's leadership. Saying that Witten means we don't need Glenn is simply ignorant because 1. Glenn is a widereciever and Witten is a TIGHT END 2. having our top wr back takes out the less skilled ones making it possible for bigger and better plays
im not sure what you mean by "what their record would suggest" the team record is indicative of the TEAM not the defense...our defense does enough to let Romo win football games. when your offense leads the league in plays of 20 yards or more and is probably the most explosive behin the patriots at the moment, you dont need a defense that doesnt giv up touchdowns ever. our defense does exactly what it needs to and the funny thing is running backs dont get better against defenses theyve played before, its quite the opposite. the defense showed it could contain the packers when they "tryed to go deep" and with a little work and ACTUALLY playing brett favre and not the backup i dont see why the defense cant have an even better day
thats true
most of your arguments are all sounding similar to what people have said, and i know your not trying to be hostile and neither am i, just because i am supporting a team i like does not make my remarks biased. i have backed up the things i have established as opposed to simply answering you with: COWBOYS RULE. regardless of how well our defense plays overall pales in comparison to the intensity by which the cowboys offense attacks. they hold the team off enough to let romo win, like i said before, and at the end of the day all that reall matters is that W
As a side note, go Chargers, they have no shot, but hey I can hope.