owlsgo
czech me out.
my opinion of guns: no.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ElronMac said:Walmart carries Daisy and a couple other lines in most places, but if you are just looking for something to shoot and have some fun with check out airsoft rifles pistols as well. They don't have great range but if you just plinking around they are a blast. Many poeple including myself use airsoft rifles and pistols in gun safety courses and training the younger generation. My sons first pistol was an airsoft and it is treated the same as a real rifle, even to the extent that I keep it in the gun locker, which he totally disagrees with btw.
Airsoft Website
Apollo said:This
Is
A Thread
On Opinions,
Not Advice To Buy Bloody Guns!!
Blame Canada!Sparx said:I'll tell you one thing you won't find one in Canada...that's for sure.
Apollo said:This
Is
A Thread
On Opinions,
Not Advice To Buy Bloody Guns!!
Brawny said:My guns, kept in a safe, unloaded, properly maintained, have a less probability of killing someone than my block of steak knives.
I'd much rather you not have knives than they get in the wrong hands. Please turn them in to the authorities.Frogger said:...Ah well, you're still not having them. I'd much not rather risk that chance of them getting in the wrong hands.
Knee jerk. You do realize that houses with a firearm are the safest houses and have an exponentially-lower chance of being robbed/attacked/etc?And a gun in your house, damn, I'd be scared as hell.
There are plenty of gun safes that allow quick access. This basic, obvious issue was solved long ago.And may I ask how you'd defend yourself with that gun locked away safe? -_-; There's either a risk of kids getting ahold of them, or you, in the unbloody likely event of someone wanting to steal a TV (not worth someone's life, by the way) you'd be able to get that gun from a not so kiddy safe area.
sremick said:I'd much rather you not have knives than they get in the wrong hands. Please turn them in to the authorities.
I'd also prefer you not have a car, since you might hit someone and kill them. They're deadlier than guns. Please turn in your car.
Knee jerk. You do realize that houses with a firearm are the safest houses and have an exponentially-lower chance of being robbed/attacked/etc?
No wonder more and more people are letting themselves be victims every year. They're being brainwashed into being petrified about anything with the slightest risk associated with it, even if the mere possession of it (not even having to use it) increases their safety by a ridiculously huge factor.
There are plenty of gun safes that allow quick access. This basic, obvious issue was solved long ago.
http://www.gunsafestore.com/GV1000DLX.htm
http://www.gunsafestore.com/GVB2000.htm
http://www.gunsafestore.com/sequiambiovault.htm
http://www.gunsafestore.com/biomax.htm
So the attacker is coming at your friend with a gun, so instead of your friend being able to have a gun themselves, you want your friend to have a knife. Gotcha. Knife versus gun.Frogger said:I'd much rather someone defend themselves with some stabbing action than shooting.
The stats and sources I already provided earlier in this thread. How countries that ban guns (such as Australia and the UK) have much-higher home burglary rates than countries such as the USA that don't. That those same countries (Australia and the UK) showed a sharp increase in home burglaries as soon as they tried to ban guns. How even within the USA, where gun laws aren't consistent, states with fewer gun-control laws have fewer home burglaries and less crime in-general.And you get this from where?
I do believe that my house has never been broken into
Correction: you the victim don't have guns. The robbers do.and we don't have guns, so it's not impossible to live with the fear
It's a shame that the UK fosters such a complacency with a "nanny society/government". It truly is. You become utterly dependent on someone to do everything for you, totally unable to fend for yourself in any situation. When someday you've got a guy twice your size with a knife/gun/etc who's got you cornered and threatening to rape you, let me know how your call to the police goes on your cell phone. I'll be curious.yeah, I'm sounding like a baby here, I get someone else to do anything that will have the risk of me even scratching myself.
Brawny said:So, Emma, you'd rather I be shot defending myself with a knife rather than have a chance at actually defending myself?
Hell, it sounds like you'd help them carry the TV to their car, give them the appliances too, they're of no use to us either. =P
Amen! DOWN WITH SOCIALISM.
So the attacker is coming at your friend with a gun, so instead of your friend being able to have a gun themselves, you want your friend to have a knife. Gotcha. Knife versus gun.
Hope you don't care about your friend very much, since they'll end up robbed, raped, or dead.
Well, that's your choice.Frogger said:I really would think twice about walking home in the dark if people were allowed guns on the street
sremick said:So the attacker is coming at your friend with a gun, so instead of your friend being able to have a gun themselves, you want your friend to have a knife. Gotcha. Knife versus gun.
Hope you don't care about your friend very much, since they'll end up robbed, raped, or dead.
The stats and sources I already provided earlier in this thread. How countries that ban guns (such as Australia and the UK) have much-higher home burglary rates than countries such as the USA that don't. That those same countries (Australia and the UK) showed a sharp increase in home burglaries as soon as they tried to ban guns. How even within the USA, where gun laws aren't consistent, states with fewer gun-control laws have fewer home burglaries and less crime in-general.
Correction: you the victim don't have guns. The robbers do.
Did you not read the sources I've provided multiple times in this thread already? Guns are still in the hands of the criminals in the UK. Just not the victims who deserve to not be victims.
It's a shame that the UK fosters such a complacency with a "nanny society/government". It truly is. You become utterly dependent on someone to do everything for you, totally unable to fend for yourself in any situation. When someday you've got a guy twice your size with a knife/gun/etc who's got you cornered and threatening to rape you, let me know how your call to the police goes on your cell phone. I'll be curious.
"Vast majority"? Your government's own crime stats don't back that up. I quote:AndThen? said:The vast majority of burglars don't have guns here
Gun control laws are not consistent across the USA. They are state-by-state. If you look at the USA as a whole, it skews the data because we have some high-crime, high-murder areas... that happen to coincide with gun-control states. Meanwhile, the states without strict gun-control have the least crime and least murders. The data I showed in earlier posts already showed this: gun-control = more murders and crime (on a per-capita basis).And countries without gun control laws have more murders!
Your government (who probably spends more time collecting facts and statistics than you do) says otherwise. If you have a source to back up your claim, please show it.Correction: No, they don't.
Wow, that's rather convenient for you. I've seen some grade schoolers use the same tactic. It involves putting their fingers in their ears and saying "lalalalala I can't hear you".I stopped looking at the sources you posted after that one on Adelaide - they're ridiculous and unfounded.