Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't say Nintendo don't have good developers. They do! Worldclass! I just don't think they are better than the developers for PS3.mushroomedmario said:edit: ok good post gypsykid i just don't think that the wii having good developers would be a myth though
Just to clear this up, Sony Defeated Dreamcast with the DVD player in the PS2, SEGA, at the time, was on top of nintendo. Sony beat SEGA in the console wars, and now SEGA develops software for all systems.GypsyKid said:I didn't say Nintendo don't have good developers. They do! Worldclass! I just don't think they are better than the developers for PS3.
A lot of people tend to think that Nintendo has the best developers because of the fact that Nintendo is a truly legendary company that is responsible for some of the best games ever created. However, most of those games are old history now. Nintendo has a rate of coming out with maybe 3 classic games per console lifespan as developers. not only that...it's with the same damn franchises. Also, back then Nintendo had virtually no competition. They had Sega...that's it, and we all know what happened there. Sega couldn't beat them so they joined them.
PS3 Developers have a lot more classics and exclusives under their belt, and a lot more original and varying franchises. Not to mention a lot of sleeper classics. Those games that you never heard of but just happen to be on shelves outta nowhere and end up being incredible games.
Nintendo is good at what it does, has a loyal fanbase, etc. I'm not trying to completely bash them, but they put themselves in a position to be bashed by more serious gamers such as myself so they can get more favor and a lot more $$$ from the casual gamers, non gamers, families, social organizations, etc. etc.
Nintendo definitely made the best business sense. They are raking it in. However there was a huge cost to pay, and I think that was the loss of great games in favor of more dumbed down non offensive no risk gameplay.
GypsyKid said:I already know what the Wii has to offer and it is not up my alley. We all know what is coming down the pipeline pretty much, and I'm not really interested.
BTW just cause something sells like hotcakes doesn't mean it's good. MC Hammer, Vanilla Ice, and Britney Spears CD's sold like hot cakes. Now those items are complete jokes. Right now Wii is more like faddish piece of gaming..not much else. I want next gen damnit.
Until you've experienced what the PS3 has to offer you really have no clue. Not to mention they are the only system that is going to get truly next gen games. But hey, at least the kiddies and the grandparents will always be able to play the Wii for 20 minutes and then they get bored of it too.
I had even a non-gaming friend come over who was more interested in the Wii cause of all the hype and the new type of controllers. After being able to play and see what the differrent systems were about and what kind of games were coming out for each...even he was like..."screw the Wii" and his attention was focused on the PS3 quite intently without much regard for the Wii. I could tell by the way he even looked at it that he was disapponted. Right then and there I knew he understood how I felt when I had my realization about the PS3.
I've never been a PS fan. I was nintendo all the way, than original XBox. Now that I look at what kind of games have been coming out for the PS2 that I missed and the games coming for the PS3...I'm floored. The Playstation has by far the greatest library with the coolest and best games.
All I can say about Nintendo is been there done that. Even with the Wiimote. Now I can say "been there done that" and shake a stick at it...and the stick will respond on-screen. Big deal.
If I need excercise I think I'd rather go outside. If I want to play games I'm going to play the best system out there...PS3
Gypsykid said:You got it wrong again fella. The reason YOU don't get it is cause you don't really know much about the PS3 do you?
Developers are going to Wii...for a short little while...to make that quick cash while it's still a hot item. The Wii's potential is pretty limited. If you do some research you will find that developers are continually hitting ceilings with the systems. Which means they are reaching or reached the limit of what they can do, and don't have enough power and space to take things to the truly next level.
Now what does that mean for the games they develop? It means they are continually compromised in most cases. You are not getting the best that is possible because you are getting something that is a huge compromise from the developers point of view. On top of that each new game at that point is usually just a re-iteration of games from the past.
The PS3 doesn't have that problem as of yet for developers. Look at the games that are coming out for PS3. They are mindblowing both graphically and gameplay wise. There isn't a single Wii game that can top the PS3 exclusives. Metroid, mario, SSMB, none of those can hold a candle to LAIR, MGS4 etc on ANY level. Those games are just way too advanced for Wii.
I don't have to prove anything cause this post will be here for years and years. When the cap is reached for what Wii and 360 can do, and the developers creativity in making Wiimote, nunchuck, or a million other peripherals to work in new interesting ways gets depleted, and the PS3 games are kicking complete butt and the system STILL won't have reached it's potential...everyone will be running to PS3. The PS3 system is on a 10 year plan. I'm guessing the Wii is on more like 3-5 year plan.
The PS3 is a very LOOOONG range system with a lot more potential in every single way. With the complete adaptability and versatility of the machine do you honestly think that Sony isn't cable of putting out peripherals and games that will put the wiimote and nunchuck to absolute shame as well as continue to do what they are currently doing?
The same can't be said about the Wii. The Wii can never have the graphic or physics capability, the storage space required to program not only better graphics but BETTER AND MORE COMPLEX GAMING CODE. 8 gigs of storage space per disc versus 50 gigs is a HUGE difference in gaming. More code space means the potential to do A LOT more with the games.
See I'm not a small picture thinking kinda guy. I don't care that Wii is getting some developers to make some games for a year or two. I don't care that Nintendo is going to continually re-hash mario, and zelda, and samus, and whatever characters they had for 20 years ad nauseum.
Regardless, no matter what you think, there will always be developers working for PS3 looking to make the best possible games...not churn out BS games as fast as possible just to make a fast buck and capitalize on a current trend.
Plus...swinging wiimotes and chucks does get boring....quick. Now if people get sick of the Wiimote games after a year or two and people just want to go back to playing games using a regular controller, which I'm guessing is what will happen, is Wii going to be able to go an make some fantastic regular controller based games that won't seem like the caveman ages compared to the PS3? No, cause they can't. It's physically impossible for them to do so. The gameplay and looks will just be too outdated.
Anyways, I'll stop babbling here. So that the guy who accused me of babbling can go on and babble himself in a less informed and intelligent way and prove even less than I ever could.
Gypsykid said:I didn't say Nintendo don't have good developers. They do! Worldclass! I just don't think they are better than the developers for PS3.
A lot of people tend to think that Nintendo has the best developers because of the fact that Nintendo is a truly legendary company that is responsible for some of the best games ever created. However, most of those games are old history now. Nintendo has a rate of coming out with maybe 3 classic games per console lifespan as developers. not only that...it's with the same damn franchises. Also, back then Nintendo had virtually no competition. They had Sega...that's it, and we all know what happened there. Sega couldn't beat them so they joined them.
PS3 Developers have a lot more classics and exclusives under their belt, and a lot more original and varying franchises. Not to mention a lot of sleeper classics. Those games that you never heard of but just happen to be on shelves outta nowhere and end up being incredible games.
Nintendo is good at what it does, has a loyal fanbase, etc. I'm not trying to completely bash them, but they put themselves in a position to be bashed by more serious gamers such as myself so they can get more favor and a lot more $$$ from the casual gamers, non gamers, families, social organizations, etc. etc.
Nintendo definitely made the best business sense. They are raking it in. However there was a huge cost to pay, and I think that was the loss of great games in favor of more dumbed down non offensive no risk gameplay.
Tails McCloud~ said:Just to clear this up, Sony Defeated Dreamcast with the DVD player in the PS2, SEGA, at the time, was on top of nintendo. Sony beat SEGA in the console wars, and now SEGA develops software for all systems.
If that help'd, you're welcome.
How ****in stupid you are. Don't even understand the point of analogies do you? Well how about this. nintendo rips off gamers by making games for babies .....how's that *****? hahahaCantGetAWii said:Sorry but my friend, chu dumb.
You don't know what the Wii has to offer, no one can say they do know. Seriously. BTW the artists you mentioned, yeah sorry but Nintendo doesn't rip off people, and pop out 3 babies a year.
And Ps3 the only system with next generation games :lol:..ok and oh yeah enjoy your tilt and no rumble on your Ps3.
Now I don't know your friend, but being a non-gamer he knows nothing, also just because he doesn't look at the wii the same way he does at you,
that is not my fault and sorry but those games coming out for Ps3..Killzone 2?..may look nice, but can't say the same about the gameplay.
By the way the Ps3 has one of the worst libraries out there, 360's is much better.
I also don't recall a game where you "shake a stick" and the Wii is not just about exercise, like c'mon, but we all know you don't get any anyways.
Wow, you just don't stop do you. Many developers are coming to Wii because
they see potential in the system, clearly.
And sorry but the ps3 does not have good gameplay. And you keep talking about rehashing games..hmm Killzone 2, Metal Gear Solid 4 wow groundbreaking stuff, just because Nintendo has been out more does not make what sony is doing different.
Oh big deal I was one off. go **** yourself. Zelda TP was gamecube game. regardless it's just sequels to the games that came out on the last system aren't they? That was my point you retard. That would be cool if they had more great classic games to offer but they DON'T ahahahahaAgain another dumb fanboy post will false info. 3 classic games for Nintendo systems..ok well Zelda is one already, then we have Metroid Prime 3, Super Mario Galaxy and Super Smash Bros. Brawl there is four already. Plus another Zelda..so 5 at least. Wrong again you are.
Also the hits are rehashed games, ok let us look at Ps3's "hits"..Killzone 2, MGS4..not rehashed at all..no way. a lot more classics and exclusives on the ps3, yeah thats why many games are shooters and can be found on the xbox 360 :lol:
And where does your info come from?..Sega lost to Ps2 of all people I thought you would have known that and dream about that every night, wether the dream is wet or dry who's to say. Sega lost to the dvd player, and makes games for everyone.
You probably have more dumb posts on the other pages, but sell your wii, go to ps3 chat so I never have to read your lame posts again ok?
Why The Ps3 Isn't selling.....
There have been numerous reports around the web the last couple of days of many stores having PS3s by the stacks and many people are surprised that a next-gen console could be found easily this close after its launch. However, when you think about the environment that the PS3 debuted in it really is no surprise that it isn’t breaking the sales records that many analysts predicted.
Here are some reasons why the PS3 isn’t selling as well as people thought it would.
Families want to play together.
Gaming has become a national past time in many households, but unfortunately many families also feel a disconnect because of gaming. Kids usually lock themselves in their rooms to play the latest games while parents wonder how they can spend more time with the kids. I’ve heard of parents trying to get into gaming, but there is such a strong disconnect between hardcore games and casual games that often times they simply give up. Enter the Nintendo Wii.
When Nintendo made it known that they were targeting casual gamers this also meant people who never really got into gaming because it didn’t appeal to them. Seeing how Nintendo Sports works and its hard for any parent to pass it up thinking of how great it would be to finally play a game that the whole family can get involved in. Instead of creating a next-gen console, Nintendo has created the new dinner table for the 21st century.
All my friends have a 360.
With multiplayer gaming on the rise, gamers want to play with their friends and of the three next-gen consoles out, most people will have the 360. Mix that in with the perfection that is Xbox Live and the 360 becomes one of the default gaming systems to get any gamer. I know that is a bold statement, but you already have a deep library of games and if you are going to compare the PS3 with the 360 you will see that the graphics and games aren’t any different at the moment.
People follow the crowds and currently the crowds are on Xbox Live.
Nobody cares about Blu-ray.
Okay, more than nobody cares about Blu-ray, but with the PS3 using Blue-ray it quickly became the main selling point for a system that’s main function is to play games. Looking at a HD-DVD or a Blu-ray disc on a conventional television and you won’t notice any difference than the image from a standard DVD. The majority of homes are still using conventional televisions and don’t have the entertainment setups that fully utilize all the features that Blu-ray offers.
Sure it is cheaper than a standalone Blu-ray player, but when those aren’t selling, what makes people think that they will sell on a video game console?
PS2 is too strong.
I think anyone will admit that the PS2 won the last console race and there are still great games being released for it so if you are a Playstation fanboy what reason do you really have to rush out and get a PS3 when you still have a very capable system and a huge collection of great games available? The Wii is simply better than the Gamecube through game mechanics and the Xbox 360 has been out long enough that if you are a Microsoft lover there is no reason to stick with the original Xbox besides to play games that aren’t backwards compatible.
Sony mistakenly believed that the success of the PS2 would translate over to the PS3 when this obviously was not the case.
$600 for a DVD player.
you are going for the 60gb version you will have to fork over $600 for the system. If you are looking to get another controller and a game you are starting to look at $700 just to go home with something you can play. Parents are only so stupid and love their children only so much before realizing they can get more bang for their buck somewhere else.
What the future holds.
This doesn’t mean that the PS3 is a bust because it is simply too early to tell. With over 750,000 units sold during the holiday season you definitely can’t call it a failure. However, for everyone expecting great things still in Sony’s future because of exclusives you have to keep in mind that no publisher likes to give exclusives to any game console unless it is the leader of the pack. With so many Wiis and 360s out there in the market it will be hard for Sony to keep all of their exclusive titles exclusive and therefore giving people less of a reason to buy it.
There is a long way to go before we can declare a winner for this generation of the console wars, but I can guarantee this round will be much more interesting than the last one.
xIcaruSx said:Aww how cute another kid misinformed about Microsoft who thinks they are the big evil corporation!!! Sounds like me when I was 11 and ignorant!
Oh and don't make Novel posts. We don't like you enough to read all of that.
GypsyKid said:We? Haha you mean your internet friends? How pathetic. Get a life you ****in loser. It's an internet forum. Not some junior high pathetic loser clique.
Another retard. What a shame. Who said they are a big evil corporation? I certainly didn't, you monkey.
Microsoft is WELL KNOWN as being a ruthless competitor. How do you think they got to where they are at? Your completely ignorant of REAL business and how it actually works. It's well documented the tactics Microsoft has used behind the scenes. Did I say evil or demonic in one instance? Go back and read. Don't think for one instance they will abandon 360 mid stream if it's sales start to lag. They won't support the console for the traditional 5 year life span if that happens. Microsoft NEEDS to be "on top" and will do anything to accomplish that. Again that's not "evil" ignorant retard boy. It's called COM-PET-I-TIVE. Read, learn, grow, understand, break the cycle of coming from a pool of stupid backwards people.
Besides. it sounds like you were a lot smarter when you were 11. What happened? Fall down stairs? Hit by a car? Some other kind of trauma which caused severe brain damage? Maybe doing nothing but playing playing baby games all day? I feel sorry for you. I really do. Your brain must be almost complete mush by now. No hope for you.....hahahaha
xIcaruSx said:Lmao that was the most random bullshit whine rant post I have read on these forums. Why are you ranting on about business philosophy? You were the one bitching about Microsoft's practices. You said it yourself it is just being a competitor.
If anything brought my brain to mush, it was reading retarded posts like that . I will miss you when you're banned. Have fun getting bashed on the PS3 forums fagbag. And don't you find it a little silly to be calling someone a boy when biologically speaking, they are old enough to have been the one inside your mom that created your existence?