tarheelsuperman
...it gonna be zoppity
Couple more for comments and I already know that they are big renders Ty 
.
.
Official Graphics Comments & Criticism
- Thread starter ssbb_lover
- Start date
iRAWR
rawrrr
@ popert too small :\
@ tarheel
the first one is awesome, but in IMO i dont like the 2nd one
the scratchy lines on spiderman kinda ruined it for me :/
@ tarheel
the first one is awesome, but in IMO i dont like the 2nd one
the scratchy lines on spiderman kinda ruined it for me :/
iRAWR
rawrrr
ahh screw it, photoshop is slow on my comp, when i drag a graident, it takes like 5 mins to finish
im sticking with gimp ;D
im sticking with gimp ;D
Foxy
Super Ninjarator
- Apr 4, 2007
- 6,677
- 105
- Wii Online Code
- 3881-9484-9041-5848
Wow, yesterday popert you really improved, still some things to improve on but you made a big leap, does your brother have a account here?
Anyways, just what to get more reaction on my new sig, I think it's my best by far and think I learned alot while doing it
C&C Please
Anyways, just what to get more reaction on my new sig, I think it's my best by far and think I learned alot while doing it
C&C Please
demonflair
Slowly returning..
popert8 said:
I personally love this tag.. it's great
Did your brother help you that much, or he just gave you some tips and you followed them??
Monsteroids
Psychedelic Snail
Wow so many sexy sigs!
mmmm... I know the fundamentals, but can never bring 'em out all at once nicely. hnnnnnmmmmm..... A great congratz to popert! Already makes nicer siggies than I ever will! *envy* *envy* *envy* :mad5:
mmmm... I know the fundamentals, but can never bring 'em out all at once nicely. hnnnnnmmmmm..... A great congratz to popert! Already makes nicer siggies than I ever will! *envy* *envy* *envy* :mad5:
popert8 said:I made these with help from my older brother
Please comment on them...
I have a feeling these are RIPPED !
Only because the text POPERT never matches the feeling of the sig. And the URL says sighack, 2, and 4.
And the middle sig, Venom, it has Popert cover up something white.
And this awesome sig is sighack6, and it has a black rectangle.......maybe something to cover up the text ?
Last edited:
Celestial
WiiChat Member
Made one last night, thought it looked cool:
Is it good?
Is it good?
Foxy
Super Ninjarator
- Apr 4, 2007
- 6,677
- 105
- Wii Online Code
- 3881-9484-9041-5848
Close said:I have a feeling these are RIPPED !
Only because the text POPERT never matches the feeling of the sig. And the URL says sighack, 2, and 4.
And this awesome sig is sighack6,
On the middle the popert text is right in top of a name. .
and in that link you gave, there is a black rectangle with text on it, maybe covering something?
Gah theorys. . . .
Good sigs nonetheless
Edited
I have a feeling these are RIPPED !
Only because the text POPERT never matches the feeling of the sig. And the URL says sighack, 2, and 4.
And the middle sig, Venom, it has Popert cover up something white.
And this awesome sig is sighack6, and it has a black rectangle.......maybe something to cover up the text ?
popert8 said:I made these with help from my older brother
Please comment on them...
I have a feeling these are RIPPED !
Only because the text POPERT never matches the feeling of the sig. And the URL says sighack, 2, and 4.
And the middle sig, Venom, it has Popert cover up something white.
And this awesome sig is sighack6, and it has a black rectangle.......maybe something to cover up the text ?
Okay ^^
Text is awesome, good job.
I like the colors you used and that you didn't use a lot of colors, just a few.
The sig feeling is good. The render is good too, and I like the outline.
Nice border.
But there is not/no depth. And idk if a light source would be good, but try it out. It seems that the image is 'flat'. :/
7.8/10
Text is awesome, good job.
I like the colors you used and that you didn't use a lot of colors, just a few.
The sig feeling is good. The render is good too, and I like the outline.
Nice border.
But there is not/no depth. And idk if a light source would be good, but try it out. It seems that the image is 'flat'. :/
7.8/10
