WiiAssasin
The ride never ends
There is an invisible boundary between wanting to defeat enemies in a game and wanting to kill a certain race. I wonder why it's being blurred today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I actually want Vita's ACIII to kill British Red-Coats from that era...
Goverments have always been corrupt in a way. We're all supposedly equal in a democratic country when in reality it works like a computers Heirarchy system with servers. We're the tools at the bottom and the "gold" at the top which we believe to be is the goverment, controlling what we practically do in every day life.Hate the game, not the player... Soldiers are mindless pawns on both sides, simply fighting to protect what's dear to them. Harbor hatred for the opposing leaders who warrant war, not those who bravely fight in war.
I don't think I can say that without sounding like a philosophical, condescending douchebag, so... yeah, sorry 'bout that lol.
/philosophy with 'Karp Mod
Hate the game, not the player
You've got it backwards.
Intentionally, yes.
These soldiers are representatives of the oppressive British government at the time. America defeated England by defeating the Redcoats.
Another thing, you seem to misunderstand "Hate the player, not the game". In this case, "the men who start war and create the need itself for people to enlist in the army" are the players. The game would be the war itself.
Representatives that must be slain all the same obviously, but that doesn't mean one should direct hatred towards them in such acts. That was my point.
SSBfreakCK said:Or, you could consider the pawns of war as the players who have been enlisted by the game's existence itself. It's not a misunderstanding, it's me twisting the saying to an ends of defining my point. Though the way you put it certainly is more applicable.