flight1991
STOP IT!
- Sep 1, 2007
- 277
- 11
- Wii Online Code
- 6396-1679-5264-9815
well. im thinking about 1200. I dont know though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're twice the price of a 50" and don't come with anything to improve quality. Just so you know, for an average TV watcher, .25/ hour is expensive because you have to pay for TV/ Satellite, your movies, power, etc. think about it.sremick said:Go with a projector. Projectors rule:
- Easier to ship/handle/install (and cheaper if you're paying for shipping)
- HUGE picture (easily more than 55")
- Don't require as much space in your room
- When the TV is off, you don't have an obnoxious useless piece of equipment looming
- Cheaper $$$/inch of display area
- Can you imagine if something goes wrong with your 55" and you need to send it back???
And forget the issues of "wah wah the bulbs cost too much". Do the math: works out to about $0.25/hour of TV watching time. Worth it.
Who is selling 50" TVs for $420? You can get a Mitsubishi HC1500 (720p) for $840, shipped.261311 said:They're twice the price of a 50"
Perhaps not, but they have many other advantages (as I listed). Not only cheaper, but most people interested in a 50" TV are of the "bigger is better" mindset, and wouldn't mind even bigger than 50", which a projector can easily do.and don't come with anything to improve quality
I have thought about it. And so have many other people. That's why we're all projector fans. Granted, "worth it" is subjective... someone who's poor might not find it "worth it". But someone willing to blow $1000+ on their TV probably isn't going to nitpick about $0.25/hour for a huge-arse sized TV image. Heck, the amount he'd save for that Mitsubishi versus the $1200 he was prepared to pay would pay for a spare bulb.Just so you know, for an average TV watcher, .25/ hour is expensive because you have to pay for TV/ Satellite, your movies, power, etc. think about it.
Well, that anecdotal experience proves nothing.T3kNi9e said:Considering ive yet to see anyone in my life use a projector to watch TV
I don't deny us being a minority. But what's your evidence that a non-projector is better? I offered up plenty of specific reasons supporting my side. Yours seems to be "I don't know anyone who has one, so it can't be better". I don't see you refuting my points.im going to say you are party of a minority of people who think using a projecter is more cost efficient and overall better than just buying a HDTV
Now you're just being rude and out of line. Such insults are uncalled for, don't contribute anything constructive to the discussion, and weaken your side. Instead of trolling and calling those with a different opinion "stupid" people who "don't really give a ****", how about instead addressing my specific points? I can assure you, those with projectors do "give a ****". And that's a big reason why they went with a projector... because instead of just doing what everyone else does, or some outdated concept of what is "normal", they looked at the evidence and the factors and weighed them and saw the benefits of this new technology, even though it's a new paradigm in the idea of home "TV".Seriously wtf? Using a projecter to watch TV? The only people who are going to do that are people who are stupid or don't really give a ****.
Just goes to show how out-of-touch you are with the subject you are trying to debate. Plenty of modern projectors throw out enough lumens to be seen in your average room lighting.You also have to have a near dark room
Again, you're wrong. All it takes is any neutral-colored surface. Many people just shine them on the wall. And you don't need a "big space". The bigger the space, the bigger image you can get, but you don't have to have any specific size space. Every projector manufacturer includes a chart for determining the screen size with a given throw distance. It doesn't take much distance to pull off 50" though.and a big space of all with a projection slide
Rarely a problem, and projectors are small. Just how many have you set up?Also you obviously need a place to put the projector that it faces the wall nicely without anyone blocking the path.
And I don't know too many people without a home stereo of some sort that they can easily hook up into it. And honestly, just about any set of stereo speakers is going to sound better than what is included in your TV. Hell, on my 36" tube I hooked up a $50 set of 2.1 computer speakers that sounded several-times better than what was built into it (before I upgraded to a 5.1 surround-sound receiver).Also im pretty sure you would need a sound system because ive never heard of a projector that emits sounds.
Again, shows you how out-of-touch you are with the current state of the industry and the technology. Heck, even my cousin has a cheap standard-def projector in his bedroom. He loves playing console game systems on it (he has several) but he watches TV too.The only people who should be using a projectors are people who often give presentations off computers or some rich guy trying to create a theatre in their house.
flight1991 said:well. im thinking about 1200. I dont know though